This election was a planned coup against the president

The election has been stolen. Every day there are new affidavits, videos of fraud, and lists of names of deceased people who have apparently cast a vote. This model isn’t new, however. The methods behind this orchestrated theft by the ruling class and their vast networks of well-funded NGOs have been tried and tested; look no further than Eastern Europe. 

The results of the intents of this model are beginning to materialize. It is a model used by bad actors in our military complex and national security apparatus. This is a model which has successfully overthrown targeted regimes in several Eastern European countries that the state department did not approve of. The same tactics used against these foreign leaders are now being used against President Trump. This particular type of Coup has been called The Color Revolution.

Let me take you back to election night. President Trump was gaining on former Vice President Biden fast; he was catching up and they were nearly neck and neck. Even the biased media called Florida--a state which has been historically proven to decide the winner of the whole race. The very next morning, the country woke up to news of ballots being suddenly discovered in highly contested battleground states. These weren’t just a handful of ballots; there were hundreds of thousands of ballots which, when counted, boosted Biden’s numbers massively.  

Mathematically, this literally makes zero sense. Mail-in ballots were ordered in by both registered Republicans and Democrats in equal proportion. So, why would they all suddenly go one way?

Enter the Color Revolution framework. This model operates in three stages: (1) first, the media planting the idea that a candidate they oppose is a bad actor who favors Russia, (2) second, they pave the way for a highly contested election scenario, (3) third, they fund massive protests, (4) lastly, the media frames the way opposition to these protests is covered--those who oppose it are “fascists”. 

 President Trump’s victory in 2016 and Brexit were both populist victories achieved through the ballot box. Both of these victories were ones decided by the will of the people; both campaigns operated on promises of Nationalist, socio-economic reform. So why, pray tell, were words like “fascist” thrown around so freely? Is 17 million people voting for Brexit fascist? Both these cases were a healthy demonstration of democracy, whether or not you personally favored the outcome. 

2016 saw President Trump running not just against Hillary Clinton--but the entire Democratic party, most of the Repiblican party, the Department of Justice, the CIA, the FBI, the media, and Hollywood (all of whom, happen to be on the same team if you observe how the money circulates). In the end he won. If this isn’t a stress test for actual democracy, then I have no clue what is. 

The opposition likes to use the word “populist” as pejorative for people advocating for democracy. The mainstream media has reframed the word democracy to now mean the inverse of its working definition. To them, defending “democracy” means defending the powered interests of the particular segment of the ruling class that loathes any semblance of populism. 

It’s no coincidence that so many of the key figures involved in the removal of President Trump have had (some currently still have) bureaucratic posts that concerned handling Eastern Europe. This perfectly explains why Russia is alluded to so often. Every single color revolution has seen the opposition use an attack that associates those they antagonize with Russia and Putin. They are literally using this same exact strategy now, attempting to tie Trump to Putin for the past four years with a story that keeps changing and zero evidence. 

This same model has proven to be instrumental in the censorship of conservatives on social media since 2015 and the highly organized and well-funded burning of major cities in 2020. As you can see, this has nothing to do with supporting democracy; this is practically the opposite of democracy. A situation wherein an election is decided in the streets and the courts--as opposed to the polls-- is not democracy. 

The poll is the one place these bad actors don't control, and so they will do anything to salt the earth of any integrity the poll once had. These bad actors hace reframed democracy to be a system which suits globalism, open borders, bad trade deals, and a corrupt state that will not benefit the general interest of American Citizens. To them, this election should be adjudicated everywhere else except the polls. Evidently, that’s what is happening now.