Proof that sharpiegate is real

 

A blatantly false narrative the media likes to push is that President Trump’s efforts to overturn the election results are gradually proving to be for naught. What the media has unsurprisingly failed to acknowledge is that the failed cases in Michigan, Arizona, and Georgia were brought forth by groups not even affiliated with the Trump campaign. These groups--as clarified by Atty. Rudy Giuliani--are being erroneously and deliberately lumped, by the media, with Trump’s legal team to push this narrative. 

Patrick M. Byrne, the former CEO of overstock.com, who has had experience working with the FBI has been working closely with Atty. Sidney Powell to shine light on the corrupt players behind the alleged massive election fraud. Byrne has gone on the record claiming that he is non-partisan: he did not vote for Trump in 2016, nor did he do so in 2020. Byrne asserts that the corruption has taken three forms: that which happened technologically, that which happened on the ground, and that which ties both these forms together. 

He alleges that Dominion’s equipment was built in such a way that it would give the administrators at the voting precincts the ability to shift votes from one candidate to another. The technology these machines used was built in Venezuela for the sole purpose of ensuring that Hugo Chavez would be president of Venezuela for life. This same software ended up as the core operator in the core operating code of many mainstream commercial election systems used in the United States. 

The functionality is all the same, however, and these machines were used in 29 states on election day. The same privileges that Chavez’s people had had in Venezuela were granted to those operating in the United States. Since this software is hooked up to the internet, this provides a backdoor channel for people in other countries to hack into the system and manipulate the votes (which candidate is in clear cahoots with China?). 

Another troubling issue is the case of what has now been called “sharpiegate”. If you happened to make a mistake on the ballot which rendered your vote unreadable by the machine, the administrator at the precinct would then hit a green button. According to sworn affidavits, voters were told that their unreadable ballots were put aside to be counted later, after the green button was hit by the administrator at the precinct (the alternative would be to go to the back of the line and wait hours before casting your vote again). 

This was a lie told to voters are the precincts. What really happened was that the votes that were put aside were then scanned, and then dragged and dropped into Biden’s folder via the machine. Choosing to submit your vote and hit that green button is tantamount to surrendering it to the administrator at the precinct to do whatever they wish with it. 

According to affidavits in Maricopa, Arizona, the workers at the precincts were told to replace the ballpoint pens with sharpies (cartons of them were there, at the ready). Even people who had taken their own personal ballpoint pens were instructed to use sharpies by the workers at the precinct.So, what happens when the machine is unable to read the ballots marked by the sharpies? The administrator hits the green button! 

The media has been exercising its due diligence, however, in portraying “Sharpiegate” as a conspiracy theory. The only perspective the media has given us, as of this writing, are testonimies from the administrators at the precinct who claim that they supplied “quick-dry sharpies” to the voters. The media literally interviewed the perpetrators of the crime and used their word to debunk the claims of the victims. That’s like asking a suicide bomber what he intends to do with the bombs strapped to his body without a hint of rational skepticism. 

Now, factor in the fact that Dominion’s machines were used in Maricopa on election day. The one county that invalidated all these ballots just so happens to have machines with the green button that allows you to drag and drop votes to your preferred candidate. Affidavits from precinct workers claim that they were told to remove all ballpoint pens from the vicinity and replace them with sharpies. One can only wonder why.